Preview

Surgery and Oncology

Advanced search

Results of surgical treatment of patients with cancer of the pancreatic body and tail and invasion of the celiac trunk

Abstract

Aim. To demonstrate relative safety, marked pain releif effect and satisfactory long-term results of surgical treatment of patients with ductal carcinoma of the pancreatic body and tail with invasion of the celiac trunk in the form of distal subtotal pancreatic resection (DSPR) with resection of the celiac trunk.
Materials and methods. The retrospective study included patients with cancer of the pancreatic head and tail with invasion of the celiac trunk who underwent DSPR with resection of the celiac trunk at the N . N . Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology in 2001–2023. Surgical complications were evaluated per the Clavien–Dindo classification. At the preoperative stage, angiography was performed to thoroughly evaluate the condition of the collateral system between the superior mesenteric and common hepatic arteries. According to the criteria we developed during this study, patients with undeveloped collaterals underwent preoperative embolization of the common hepatic artery with metallic spirals preserving blood flow through the gastroduodenal artery. Considering patients’ complaints of local pain of varying intensity at hospitalization, we evaluated their pain syndrome using the V isual Analogue Scale (VAS) before and after surgical treatment.
Results. DSPR with resection of the celiac trunk and common hepatic artery was performed in 32 patients. In 8 (25 %) of them, due to undeveloped arterial collaterals between the systems of the superior mesenteric and hepatic arteries, 7–14 days prior to surgery embolization of the common hepatic artery was performed with preservation of blood flow through the gastroduodenal artery. In 18 (56.25 %) patients, superior mesenteric and / or portal veins invaded by the tumor were resected along with the celiac trunk. In 84.4 % of cases, the volume of surgical treatment was R0; in 9.4 % of cases, R1; in 6.2 % of cases, R2. Frequency of histologically confirmed invasion of the celiac trunk was 78.1 %, magistral veins 72.2 %, perineural invasion 90.6 %. A correlation (r = 0.55; р = 0.001) between the presence of perineural invasion and local pain at the preoperative stage was observed. Mean pain syndrome intensity per VAS in patients with perineural invasion was 7.3 points which was significantly (р = 0.000001) higher than in patients without perineural invasion (2.7 points). DSPR with resection of the celiac trunk and nerve dissection relieved pain syndrome in all patients. Complications after DSPR with resection of the celiac trunk were observed in 17 (53.1 %) patients, in 14 (43.7 %) their severity was grade III or higher per the Clavien–Dindo scale. Mortality was 6.3 %. Oneand 2‑year survival of patients with locally advanced ductal carcinoma of the pancreatic body and tail after DSPR with resection of the celiac trunk were 65.2 and 10.2 %, respectively, median overall survival was 15 months, maximal lifespan was 57 months. One- and 3‑year survival without signs of progression was 46.2 and 8.8 %, respectively, median progression-free survival was 9.9 months.
Conclusion. DSPR with resection of the celiac trunk and common hepatic artery is relatively safe, allows to relieve pain syndrome with significant improvement in the quality of life of the patients, and promotes longer survival.

About the Authors

М. G. Abgaryan
N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Mikael Grantovich Abgaryan

24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522



Yu. I. Patyutko
N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522



А. G. Kotelnikov
N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522



I. A. Faynshteyn
N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522



I. S. Stilidi
N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522



References

1. Mayumi T., Nimura Y., Kamiya J. et al. Distal pancreatectomy with en bloc resection of the celiac artery for carcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas. Int J Gastrointest Cancer 1997;22(1):15–21. DOI: 10.1007/BF02803900

2. Klompmaker S., de Rooij T., Korteweg J.J. et al. Systematic review of outcomes after distal pancreatectomy with coeliac axis resection for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 2016;103(8):941–9. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10148

3. Yamamoto T., Satoi S., Kawai M. et al. Is distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection effective for patients with locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma? Multicenter surgical group study. Pancreatology 2018;18(1):106–13. DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2017.11.005

4. Liu L., Liu T.-X., Huang W.-X. et al. Distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection for locally advanced pancreatic body/ tail cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Surg 2022;45(1):51–61. DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.06.002

5. Clavien P.A., Sanabria J.R., Strasberg S.M. Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery 1992;111(5):518–26. PMID: 1598671

6. Nakao A., Takagi H. Isolated pancreatectomy for pancreatic head carcinoma using catheter bypass of the portal vein. Hepatogastroenterology 1993;40:426–9. PMID: 8270230

7. Aitken R.C. Measurement of feelings using visual analogue scales. Proc R Soc Med 1969;62(10):989–93. DOI: 10.1177/003591576906201005

8. Bassi C., Marchegiani G., Dervenis C. et al. International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 2017;161(3):584–91. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014

9. Kondo S., Katoh H., Omi M. et al. Radical distal pancreatectomy with en bloc resection of the celiac artery, plexus, and ganglions for advanced cancer of the pancreatic body: a preliminary report on perfect pain relief. JOP 2001;2(3):93–7. PMID: 11870330

10. Hirano S., Kondo S., Hara T. et al. Distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection for locally advanced pancreatic body cancer. Ann Surg 2007;246(1):46–51. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000258608.52615.5a

11. Gong H., Ma R., Gong J. et al. Distal pncreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Medicine 2016;95(10):e3061. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003061

12. Hishinuma S., Ogata Y., Tomikawa M., Ozawa I. Stomachpreserving distal pncreatectomy with combined resection of the celiac artery: radical procedure for locally advanced cancer of the pancreatic body. J Gastroint Surg 2007;11(6):743–9. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-007-0143-x

13. Jing W., Zhu G., Hu X. et al. Distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection for the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic body and tail cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 2013;60(121):187–90. DOI: 10.5754/hge12499

14. Zhou Y.-M., Zhang X.-F., Li X.-D. et al. Distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection for pancreatic body-tail cancer: Is it justified? Med Sci Monit 2014;20:1–5. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.889847

15. Hirano S., Kondo S., Tanaka E. et al. Postoperative bowel function and nutritional status following distal pancreatectomy with en-bloc celiac axis resection. Dig Surg 2010;27(3):212–6. DOI: 10.1159/000265573

16. Nakamura T., Hirano S., Noji T. et al. Distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection (modified appleby procedure) for locally advanced pancreatic body cancer: a single-center review of 80 consecutive patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2016;23(S5):969–75. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5493-8


Review

Views: 18


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-5857 (Online)