Clinical significance of intraoperative histological examination of resection margins during organ-preserving operations

Introduction. Today, resection margins are assessed in different ways, but in clinical practice, preference is given to the histological method with macro- and microscopic examination of the margins. Assessment of resection margins can be carried out not only during planned histological examination, but also during intraoperative examination.

Aim. To evaluate the feasibility of intraoperative assessment of resection margins when performing organ-preserving operations in patients with primary resectable breast cancer.

Materials and methods. A retrospective study analyzed data from patients with early breast cancer who underwent surgical treatment at the Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health of Russia from June 2020 to May 2022. All patients underwent mammary gland resection with or without intraoperative marginal GI of resection, with sentinel lymph node determination or regional lymphadenectomy at the first stage. Patients included in the final analysis were divided into 2 groups: the study group consisted of patients who underwent intraoperative marginal GI of resection, and the control group consisted of patients who did not undergo intraoperative marginal GI of resection. Marginal GI of resection is performed by a pathologist by measuring the distance from the tumor node to the resection margins on a macropreparation. Frozen sections were always stained with hematoxylin and eosin.

Results. The 451 patients with early forms of breast cancer included in the final analysis and subjected to breast resection at the first stage were divided into 2 main groups: the study group consisted of patients (n = 310) who underwent intraoperative microscopic histological assessment of resection margins, and the control group included patients (n = 141) who did not undergo intraoperative assessment of resection margins. During intraoperative histological assessment of resection margins, patients with positive resection margins were most often observed with invasive cancer – 20.3 versus 3.9 % with intraductal cancer.

Conclusion. Further research is needed to determine the factors influencing the increase in the incidence of positive resection margins and their impact on patient survival rates.

1. Koopmansch C., Noël J.-Ch., Maris C. et al. Intraoperative evaluation of resection margins in breast-conserving surgery for in situ and invasive breast carcinoma. Breast Cancer (Auckl) 2021:15:1178223421993459. DOI: 10.1177/1178223421993459

2. Butler-Henderson K., Lee A.H., Price R.I., Waring K. Intraoperative assessment of margins in breast conserving therapy: a systematic review. Breast 2014;23(2):112–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2014.01.002

3. Laws A., Brar M.S., Bouchard-Fortier A. et al. Does intra-operative margin assessment improve margin status and re-excision rates? J Surg Oncol 2018;118(7):1205–11. DOI: 10.1002/jso.25248

4. Cendan J.C., Coco D., Copeland 3rd E.M. Accuracy of intraoperative frozensection analysis of breast cancer lumpectomy-bed margins. J Am Coll Surg 2005;201(2):194–8.

5. Esbona K., Li Z., Wilke L.G. Intraoperative imprint cytology and frozen section pathology for margin assessment in breast conservation surgery: a systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol 2012;19(10):3236–45. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2492-2

6. Weber W.P., Engelberger S., Viehl C.T. et al. Accuracy of frozen section analysis versus specimen radiography during breastconserving surgery for nonpalpable lesions. World J Surg 2008;32(12):2599–606. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-008-9757-8

7. Jorns J.M., Visscher D., Sabel M. et al. Intraoperative frozen section analysis of margins in breast conserving surgery significantly decreases reoperative rates: one-year experience at an ambulatory surgical center. Am J Clin Pathol 2012;138(5):657–69. DOI: 10.1309/AJCP4IEMXCJ1GDTS

8. Sabel M.S., Jorns J.M., Wu A. et al. Development of an intraoperative pathology consultation service at a free-standing ambulatory surgical center: clinical and economic impact for patients undergoing breast cancer surgery. Am J Surg 2012;204(1):66–77. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.07.016

9. Martin D.T., Sandoval S., Ta C.N. et al. Quantitative automated image analysis system with automated debris filtering for the detection of breast carcinoma cells. Acta Cytol 2011;55(3):271–80. DOI: 10.1159/000324029

10. Moran M.S., Schnitt S.J., Giuliano A.E. et al. Society of Surgical Oncology – American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with wholebreast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014;88(3):553–64. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.11.012

11. Görner M., Just M., Gerull S. Early-stage breast cancer – strategies for adjuvant systemic therapy. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2008;40(4):230–8. (In Germ.). DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1038926

12. Fleming F.J., Hill A.D.K., Mc Dermott E.W. et al. Intraoperative margin assessment and re-excision rate in breast conserving surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 2004;30(3):233–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2003.11.008