Influence of colorectal anastomotic leakage on time before the loop stoma closing
https://doi.org/10.17650/2949-5857-2023-13-4-11-16
Abstract
Background. Important task is determining the long-term consequences of colorectal anastomotic leakage. Leakage with clinical manifestations leads to a higher frequency of local recurrences of rectal cancer and increases the severity of manifestations of low anterior resection syndrome. How does the leakage of colorectal anastomosis affect the period before the closure of loop stoma?
Aim. To determine the influence of anastomotic leakage on the term before closing the ileostomy.
Methods. In this retrospective incomparable study were included 618 patients with rectal cancer who had been underwent anterior or low anterior resection with formation colorectal anastomosis and loop stoma.
Results. Colorectal anastomotic leakage was detected in 86 from 618 patients (13.9 %). The loop stoma was closed in 513 from 618 (83 %) patients. The time to the preventive stoma closure in patients with anastomotic leakage was significantly higher than in patients without anastomotic leakage, p = 0.001. Reconstructive surgery in patients without anastomotic leakage was performed in 9 months after anterior resection. The median time before the stoma closure of patients with X – ray anastomosis leakage was 11 months, with clinical leakage – 17 months, p <0.001.
Conclusion. Colorectal anastomotic leakage statistically increases the term before ileostomy closure.
About the Authors
A. A. Balkarov
Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Artem Anatolyevich Balkarov
2 Salyama Adilya St., Moscow 123423
M. V. Alekseev
Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology, Ministry of Health of Russia; Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
2 Salyama Adilya St., Moscow 123423
2/1 Barricadnaya St., Moscow 123995
E. G. Rybakov
Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
2 Salyama Adilya St., Moscow 123423
Yu. A. Shelygin
Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology, Ministry of Health of Russia; Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology, Ministry of Health of Russia; Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
2 Salyama Adilya St., Moscow 123423
2/1 Barricadnaya St., Moscow 123995
References
1. Jutesten H., Draus J., Frey J. el al. High risk of permanent stoma after anastomotic leakage in anterior resection for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2019;21(2):174–82. DOI: 10.1111/codi.14469
2. Kitaguchi D., Nishizawa Y., Sasaki T. et al. Recurrence of rectal anastomotic leakage following stoma closure: assessment of risk factors. Colorectal Dis 2019;21(11):1304–11. DOI: 10.1111/codi.14728
3. Rahbari N.N., Weitz J., Hohenberger W. et al. Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery 2010;147(3):339–51. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.10.012
4. Hain E., Maggiori L., Manceau G. et al. Persistent Asymptomatic Anastomotic Leakage After Laparoscopic Sphincter-Saving Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Can Diverting Stoma Be Reversed Safely at 6 Months? Dis Colon Rectum 2016;59(5):369–76. DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000568
5. Fayzulin R.I., Tarasov M.A., Ponomarenko A.A. et al. Does high ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery affect the results of surgery for rectal cancer? (a systematic review and meta-analysis). Koloproktologia = Coloproctology 2022;21(4):10–20. DOI: 10.33878/2073-7556-2022-21-4-10-20
6. Phan K., Oh L., Ctercteko G. et al. Does a stoma reduce the risk of anastomotic leak and need for re-operation following low anterior resection for rectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Gastrointest Oncol 2019;10(2):179–87. DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2018.11.07
7. Tan W.S., Tang C.L., Shi L. Et al. Meta-analysis of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2009;96(5):462–72. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.6594
8. Keane C., Park J., Öberg S. et al. Functional outcomes from a randomized trial of early closure of temporary ileostomy after rectal excision for cancer. Br J Surg 2019;106(5):645–52. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11092
9. Artus A., Tabchouri N., Iskander O. et al. Long term outcome of anastomotic leakage in patients undergoing low anterior resection for rectal cancer. BMC Cancer 2020;20(1):780. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07109-4
10. Gessler B., Eriksson O., Angenete E. Diagnosis, treatment, and consequences of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 2017;32(4):549–56. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-016-2744-x
11. Khomyakov E.A., Nafedzov I.O., Fomenko O.Yu. et al. Risk factors for major low anterior resection syndrome: meta-analysis and systematic literature review. Russian Open Medical Journal 2021;10(1):113. DOI: 10.15275/rusomj.2021.0113
12. Hüser N., Michalski C.W., Erkan M. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of defunctioning stoma in low rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 2008;248(1):52–60. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318176bf65
13. Shellito P.C. Complications of abdominal stoma surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41(12):1562–72. DOI: 10.1007/BF02237308
14. Anaraki F., Vafaie M., Behboo R. et al. Quality of life outcomes in patients living with stoma. Indian J Palliat Care 2012;18(3): 176–80. DOI: 10.4103/0973-1075.105687
15. Krishnamurty D.M., Blatnik J., Mutch M. Stoma Complications. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2017;30(3):193–200. DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1598160
16. Serebriy A.B., Khomyakov E.A., Nafedzov I.O. et al. Quality of life after rectal cancer surgery (systematic review). Koloproktologia = Coloproctology 2021;20(1):59–67. DOI: 10.33878/2073-7556-2021-20-1-59-67
17. Den Dulk M., Smit M., Peeters K.C. et al. A multivariate analysis of limiting factors for stoma reversal in patients with rectal cancer entered into the total mesorectal excision (TME) trial: aretrospective study. Lancet Oncol 2007;8(4):297–303. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70047-5
18. Nguyen T.H., Chokshi R.V. Low Anterior Resection Syndrome. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2020;22(10):48. DOI: 10.1007/s11894-020-00785-z
19. Chow A., Tilney H.S., Paraskeva P. et al. The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6,107 cases. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009;24(6):711–23. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-009-0660-z
Review
Views:
398
Email this article 