CLINICAL EXPERIENCE WITH DIFFERENT DRUGS FOR BOWEL PREPARATION
https://doi.org/10.17650/2220-3478-2013-0-3-56-62
Abstract
Bowel preparation remains an important issue despite vast clinical experience in this field.
Methods. 530 patients were included in retrospective analysis. 234 (44.2 %) patients in group 1 used sodium phosphate (SP) for bowel preparation, 176 (33.2 %) patients in group 2 used polyethylene glycol (PEG), 120 (22.6 %) patients used castor oil. Quality of bowel preparation was assessed according to following grading system: «good», «acceptable», «bad».
Results. «Good», «acceptable», «bad» bowel preparation was observed in following number of patients: 160 (68.4 %), 46 (19.7 %) and 28 (12 %) patients who used SP, 38.6, 40.3 and 20.1 % who used PEG and 43.3, 20.8, 35.8 % who used castor oil. Results of «good» preparation were significantly better in patients who used SP comparing to other treatment groups.
Conclusions. Better bowel preparation with SP was observed in our study, though results need to be validated in randomized trials.
About the Authors
S. G. TereshchenkoRussian Federation
Department of Endoscopy
E. V. Velikanov
Russian Federation
Department of Endoscopy
E. M. Lukina
Russian Federation
Department of Endoscopy
A. A. Titaeva
Russian Federation
Department of Endoscopy
L. V. Mechеva
Russian Federation
Department of Endoscopy
References
1. Никифоров П.А., Виноградова Н.Н., Анохина Л.Н. и др. Возможности гастроинтестинальной эндоскопии в диагностике рака желудка и толстой кишки в условиях активной диспансеризации. Кремлевская медицина 2000;1:57–60.
2. Князев М.В., Коробкин С.В. Подготовка толстой кишки к эндоскопическому исследованию препаратом Дюфалак. Клин эндоскопия 2005;3:1–3.
3. Поддубный Б.К., Мазуров С.Т., Карман С.Н. и др. «Применение препарата Дюфалак (лактулозы) для подготовки толстой кишки к колоноскопии у онкологических больных. Клин эндоскопия 2005;2:29–31.
4. Beck D.E., Fazio V.W., Jagelman D.G. Comparison of oral lavage methods for preoperative colon cleansing. Dis Colon Rectum 1986;29(11):699–703.
5. Brunelle R.L, Haves R.H., Lehman G.A., Mieler R.E. Comparative efficacy of colon cleansing methods: standard preparation versus colimmac lavage. Am J Roenthgenology 1984;142(2):309–10.
6. Hendricks J., Frasee R.C., Roberts J. et al. Prospective, randomized trail of inpatient vs. outpatient bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35(3):223–6.
7. Oberlin P. Mechanical preparation of bowel for surgery. Enemas versus whole–gat lavage. A multicenter controlled study. Coloproctology 1986;8(5):296–9.
8. Rey J., Delmotte J., Gorce D. et al. Efficacy and safety of an oral standart electrolytes solution (FORTRANS®) compared to a sodium phosphate solution (FLEET® PHOSPHO–SODA)) in the preparation of patient for colonoscopy.Citation: Endoscopy 2003;35(Suppl II)A117.
9. Schanz S., Kruis W., Mickisch O. et al. Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy with Sodium Phosphate Solution versus Polyethylene Glycol-Based Lavage: A Multicenter Trial. Diagn Ther Endosc 2008;2008:713521.
10. van Vugt van Pinxteren M.W., van Kouwen M.C., van Oijen M.G. et al. A prospective study of bowel preparation for colonoscopy with polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution versus sodium phosphate in Lynch syndrome: a randomized trial. Fam Cancer 2012;11(3):337–41.
11. Juluri R., Eckert G., Imperiale T.F. Polyethylene glycol vs. sodium phosphate for bowel preparation: a treatment arm meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Gastroenterol 2011;11:38.