Differential diagnosis of indeterminate bile duct strictures using peroral cholangioscopy
https://doi.org/10.17650/2949-5857-2025-15-2-83-88
Abstract
Introduction. Differential diagnosis of indeterminate biliary strictures is necessary for adequate planning of the treatment, which affects prognosis and helps to avoid unnecessary surgical interventions in patients with benign biliary strictures. Despite technological advances, the diagnostic accuracy of methods for the diagnosis of malignant lesions remains insufficient.
Direct visualization of the biliary tree using peroral cholangioscopy may improve the ability to diagnose indeterminate biliary strictures.
Aim. To investigate sensitivity and specificity of peroral cholangioscopy in the diagnosis of indeterminate biliary strictures.
Materials and methods. A retrospective review of the patient database of the N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology was conducted for the period from January 2022 to May 2024. Twenty-seven patients with indeterminate bile duct strictures were included in the study. After direct visualisation of the bile duct system, macroscopic tissue changes were determined and samples were taken for biopsy with SpyBite (Boston Scientific, USA) forceps.
Results. SpyGlass (Boston Scientific, USA) visual impression accuracy was 87.6 %, sensitivity – 80.0 %, negative predictive value – 88.9 %, specificity and positive predictive value – 94.11 and 88.9 % respectively. SpyBite forceps biopsy results had a specificity and positive predictive value of 100 % but sensitivity and negative predictive value of 54.5 and 76.2 % respectively.
Conclusion. Peroral cholangioscopy is an effective option in the differential diagnosis of indeterminate biliary strictures.
About the Authors
M. Yu. KurdanovaRussian Federation
24 Kashirskoe shosse, Moscow 115522
M. E. Timofeev
Russian Federation
24 Kashirskoe shosse, Moscow 115522
I. A. Karasev
Russian Federation
24 Kashirskoe shosse, Moscow 115522
O. T. Imaraliev
Russian Federation
24 Kashirskoe shosse, Moscow 115522
A. A. Salimova
Russian Federation
24 Kashirskoe shosse, Moscow 115522
References
1. Yodice M., Choma J., Tadros M. The expansion of cholangioscopy: established and investigational uses of SpyGlass in biliary and pancreatic disorders. Diagnostics (Basel) 2020;10(3):132. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics10030132
2. Badshah M.B., Vanar V., Kandula M. et al. Peroral cholangioscopy with cholangioscopy-directed biopsies in the diagnosis of biliary malignancies: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019;31(8):935–40. DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001402
3. Yurichev I.N., Timofeev M.E., Malikhova O.A., Savosin R.S. Possibilities of peroral transpapillary cholangioscopy in oncological practice. Sovremennaya onkologiya = Journal of Modern Oncology 2020;22(1):16–21. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26442/18151434.2020.1.200023
4. Woo Y.S., Lee J.K., Oh S.H. et al. Role of SpyGlass peroral cholangioscopy in the evaluation of indeterminate biliary lesions. Dig Dis Sci 2014;59(10):2565–70. DOI: 10.1007/s10620-014-3171-x
5. Chiang C.H., Chen K.C., Devereaux B. et al. Precise mapping of hilar cholangiocarcinoma with a skip lesion by SpyGlass cholangioscopy: a case report. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023;15(5):965–71. DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i5.965
6. Deprez P.H., Garces Duran R., Moreels T. et al. The economic impact of using single-operator cholangioscopy for the treatment of difficult bile duct stones and diagnosis of indeterminate bile duct strictures. Endoscopy 2018;50(2):109–18. DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-121268
7. Rodríguez Muñoz S. Cholangioscopy: seeing to believe, seeing to know, seeing to cure. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2018;110(12):745–7. DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5991/2018
8. Robles-Medranda C., Valero M., Soria-Alcivar M. et al. Reliability and accuracy of a novel classification system using peroral cholangioscopy for the diagnosis of bile duct lesions. Endoscopy 2018;50(11):1059–70. DOI: 10.1055/a-0607-2534
9. Laleman W., Verraes K., Van Steenbergen W. et al. Usefulness of the single-operator cholangioscopy system SpyGlass in biliary disease: a single-center prospective cohort study and aggregated review. Surg Endosc 2017;31(5):2223–32. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-5221-2
10. Pereira P., Vilas-Boas F., Peixoto A. et al. How SpyGlass may impact endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography practice and patient management. GE Port J Gastroenterol 2018;25(3):132–7. DOI: 0.1159/000481859
11. Navaneethan U., Hasan M.K., Kommaraju K. et al. Digital, single operator cholangiopancreatoscopy in the diagnosis and management of pancreatobiliary disorders: a multicenter clinical experience (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2016;84(4):649–55. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.03.789
12. Budzinskiy S.A., Shapovalyants S.G., Fedorov E.D. et al. Initial results of new technological approach to visualization and treatment of bile and pancreatic duct disease. Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii = Annals of HPB Surgery 2019;24(2):105–16. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.16931/1995-5464.20192105-116
13. Bykov M.I., Mnatsakanian A.Y., Taran A.A. Peroral cholangioscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of biliary strictures. Innovacionnaya medicina Kubani = Innovative Medicine of Kuban 2023;(1):79–88. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.35401/2541-9897-2023-26-1-79-88
14. Fujisawa T., Ushio M., Takahashi S. et al. Role of peroral cholangioscopy in the diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Diagnostics (Basel) 2020;10(5):268. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics10050268
15. Frantsev D.Yu., Sergeeva O.N., Shorikov M.A. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in objective response evaluation in Klatskin tumor patients after endobiliary photodynamic therapy. Onkologicheskiy zhurnal: luchevaya diagnostika, luchevaya terapiya = Journal of oncology: diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy 2024; 7(1):41–61. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.37174/2587-7593-2024-7-1-41-61
16. Shorikov M.A., Sergeeva O.N., Lapteva M.G. et al. Proximal extrahepatic bile ducts: comprehensive review. Onkologicheskiy zhurnal: luchevaya diagnostika, luchevaya terapiya = Journal of oncology: diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy 2021;4(1):74–93. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.37174/2587-7593-2021-4-1-74-93