Preview

Surgery and Oncology

Advanced search

Combined treatment of patients with ovarian metastases from gastrointestinal cancer

https://doi.org/10.17650/2949-5857-2025-15-1-42-48

Abstract

Introduction. Ovarian metastases are characterized by low sensitivity to systemic therapy and are often associated with rapid progression and poor prognosis. Given the sensitivity of metastases from cancers of gastrointestinal tract to systemic therapy, the optimal choice of treatment strategy for ovarian metastases is one of the key problems in modern oncology. The aim of the work was to evaluate the effectiveness of bilateral adnexectomy in combination with chemotherapy in patients with ovarian metastases from cancers of gastrointestinal tract.

Aim. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of bilateral adnexectomy in combination with chemotherapy in patients with metastatic ovarian lesions originating from gastrointestinal cancer.

Materials and methods. The study included 58 patients aged 37 to 77 years. The inclusion criteria were as follows: histologically verified gastrointestinal cancer; ECOG performance status grade 0–2. Patients with extensive peritoneal dissemination (P3) and brain metastases were excluded from the study. Patients were divided into 2 groups. Group A received combined treatment (adnexectomy / panhysterectomy in combination with drug therapy). Group Б received medications only. Group A was further divided into two subgroups, where Group A1 underwent change of chemotherapy regimen after surgery and Group A2 had no drug therapy adjustment following surgery.

Results. The median progression-free survival (PFS) in group A (with performed adnexectomy or panhysterectomy) was 12 months, while in group Б (no surgery was performed) the result was 4 months. Similar data were obtained when analyzing overall survival (OS) by groups. The median OS in group A was 19, notably these OS figures significantly exceeded the OS in group Б (7 months). Changing the drug therapy regimen after surgery did not demonstrate an increase in OS and PFS in patients of group A1 compared to group A2. Likewise, no statistical differences were found in OS and PFS when patients from group A underwent panhysterectomy as compared with bilateral adnexectomy. Meanwhile, panhysterectomy correlated with a prolonged postoperative recovery period and late systemic treatment resumption.

Conclusions. Combined treatment (bilateral adnexectomy + chemotherapy) significantly increases OS (19 months in group A and 7 months in group Б) and PFS (12 months and 4 months, respectively) in patients with metastatic ovarian disease compared to palliative chemotherapy. Thus, prerequisites for changing clinical practice in this category of patients have been found. The obtained results should be clarified in a randomized study. It is also worth noting that changing the line of chemotherapy is justified only in case of disease progression defined as an increase in the size of nonovarian metastatic foci. This statement should also be confirmed by the results of larger randomized studies.

About the Authors

N. Yu. Sokolov
S.P. Botkin Moscow Multidisciplinary Scientific and Clinical Center, Moscow Healthcare Department
Russian Federation

5 Vtoroy Botkinskiy proezd, Moscow 125284



Z. A. Bagatelia
S.P. Botkin Moscow Multidisciplinary Scientific and Clinical Center, Moscow Healthcare Department; Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

5 Vtoroy Botkinskiy proezd, Moscow 125284;

1 Bld., 2 / 1 Barricadnaya St., Moscow 125993



D. N. Grekov
S.P. Botkin Moscow Multidisciplinary Scientific and Clinical Center, Moscow Healthcare Department; Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

5 Vtoroy Botkinskiy proezd, Moscow 125284;

1 Bld., 2 / 1 Barricadnaya St., Moscow 125993



I. A. Polyakov
S.P. Botkin Moscow Multidisciplinary Scientific and Clinical Center, Moscow Healthcare Department
Russian Federation

Ilya Alekseevich Polyakov

5 Vtoroy Botkinskiy proezd, Moscow 125284



V. M. Kulushеv
S.P. Botkin Moscow Multidisciplinary Scientific and Clinical Center, Moscow Healthcare Department
Russian Federation

5 Vtoroy Botkinskiy proezd, Moscow 125284



V. A. Alimov
S.P. Botkin Moscow Multidisciplinary Scientific and Clinical Center, Moscow Healthcare Department; Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

5 Vtoroy Botkinskiy proezd, Moscow 125284;

1 Bld., 2 / 1 Barricadnaya St., Moscow 125993



K. S. Titov
S.P. Botkin Moscow Multidisciplinary Scientific and Clinical Center, Moscow Healthcare Department; Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba
Russian Federation

5 Vtoroy Botkinskiy proezd, Moscow 125284;

6 Miklukho-Maklaya St., Moscow 117198



S. S. Lebedev
S.P. Botkin Moscow Multidisciplinary Scientific and Clinical Center, Moscow Healthcare Department; Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

5 Vtoroy Botkinskiy proezd, Moscow 125284;

1 Bld., 2 / 1 Barricadnaya St., Moscow 125993



A. K. Chekini
S.P. Botkin Moscow Multidisciplinary Scientific and Clinical Center, Moscow Healthcare Department
Russian Federation

5 Vtoroy Botkinskiy proezd, Moscow 125284



I. O. Tinkova
S.P. Botkin Moscow Multidisciplinary Scientific and Clinical Center, Moscow Healthcare Department
Russian Federation

5 Vtoroy Botkinskiy proezd, Moscow 125284



N. M. Podzolkova
Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

1 Bld., 2 / 1 Barricadnaya St., Moscow 125993



References

1. Yada-Hashimoto N., Yamamoto T., Kamiura S. et al. Metastatic ovarian tumors: a review of 64 cases. Gynecol Oncol 2013;89(2):314–7. PMID: 12713997

2. Lee S.J., Bae J.H., Lee A.W. et al. Clinical characteristics of metastatic tumors to the ovaries. J Korean Med Sci 2009;24(1):114–9. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2009.24.1.114

3. Al-Agha O.M., Nicastri A.D. An in-depth look at Krukenberg tumor: an overview. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2006;130(11):1725–30. DOI: 10.5858/2006-130-1725-AILAKT

4. Kondi-Pafiti A., Kairi-Vasilatou E., Iavazzo C. et al. Metastatic neoplasms of the ovaries: a clinicopathological study of 97 cases. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2011;284(5):1283–8. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-011-1847-4

5. Ayhan A., Guvenal T., Salman M.C. et al. The role of cytoreductive surgery in nongenital cancers metastatic to the ovaries. Gynecol Oncol 2005;98(2):235–41. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.05.028

6. Ojo J., De Silva S., Han E. et al. Krukenberg tumors from colorectal cancer: presentation, treatment and outcomes. Am Surg 2011;77(10):1381–5.

7. Sokalska A., Timmerman D., Testa A.C. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound examination for assigning a specific diagnosis to adnexal masses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;34(4):462–70. DOI: 10.1002/uog.6444

8. Kochoyan T.M. Endosurgery in diagnostics and treatment of patients with tumors of chest organs, abdominal cavity, and retroperitoneal space: thesis ... of doctor of medicine. Moscow, 2011. (In Russ.).

9. Guerriero S., Alcazar J.L., Pascual M.A. et al. Preoperative diagnosis of metastatic ovarian cancer is related to origin of primary tumor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012;39(5):581–6. DOI: 10.1002/uog.10120

10. Erroi F., Scarpa M., Angriman I. et al. Ovarian metastasis from colorectal cancer: prognostic value of radical oophorectomy. J Surg Oncol 2007;96(2):113–7. DOI: 10.1002/jso.20803

11. Sekine K., Hamaguchi T., Shoji H. et al. Retrospective analyses of systemic chemotherapy and cytoreductive surgery for patients with ovarian metastases from colorectal cancer: a single-center experience. Oncology 2018;95(4):220–8. DOI: 10.1159/000489665

12. Goéré D., Daveau C., Elias D. et al. The differential response to chemotherapy of ovarian metastases from colorectal carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 2008;34(12):1335–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2008.03.010

13. Hamasaki S., Fukunaga Y., Nagayama S. et al. Decision-making in postoperative chemotherapy for ovarian metastasis from colorectal cancer: a retrospective single-center study. World J Surg Oncol 2022;20(1):28. DOI: 10.1186/s12957-022-02498-1

14. Yan D., Du Y., Dai G. et al. Management of synchronous krukenberg tumors from gastric cancer: a single-center experience. J Cancer 2018;9(22):4197–203. DOI: 10.7150/jca.25593

15. Ma F., Li Y., Li W. et al. Metastasectomy improves the survival of gastric cancer patients with krukenberg tumors: a retrospective analysis of 182 patients. Cancer Manag Res 2019;11:10573–80. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S227684

16. Cho J.H., Lim J.Y., Choi A.R. et al. Comparison of surgery plus chemotherapy and palliative chemotherapy alone for advanced gastric cancer with krukenberg tumor. Cancer Res Treat 2015;47(4):697–705. DOI: 10.4143/crt.2013.175

17. Namikawa T., Marui A., Yokota K. et al. Frequency and therapeutic strategy for patients with ovarian metastasis from gastric cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2022;407:2301–8. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02543-3

18. Chung T.S., Chang H.J., Jung K.H. et al. Role of surgery in the treatment of ovarian metastases from colorectal cancer. J Surg Oncol 2009;100(7):570–4. DOI: 10.1002/jso.21382

19. Lee S.J., Lee J., Lim H.Y. et al. Survival benefit from ovarian metastatectomy in colorectal cancer patients with ovarian metastasis: a retrospective analysis. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2010;66(2):229–35. DOI: 10.1007/s00280-009-1150-2

20. Kagawa H., Kinugasa Y., Yamaguchi T. et al. Impact of resection for ovarian metastases from colorectal cancer and clinicopathologic analysis: A multicenter retrospective study in Japan. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2023;8(2):273–83. DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12740

21. Jiang R., Tang J., Cheng X., Zang R.Y. Surgical treatment for patients with different origins of Krukenberg tumors: outcomes and prognostic factors. Eur J Surg Oncol 2009;35(1):92–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2008.05.006

22. McCormick C.C., Giuntoli R.L. 2nd, Gardner G.J. et al. The role of cytoreductive surgery for colon cancer metastatic to the ovary. Gynecol Oncol 2007;105(3):791–5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.02.025

23. Kim W.Y., Kim T.J., Kim S.E. et al. The role of cytoreductive surgery for non-genital tract metastatic tumors to the ovaries. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2010;149(1):97–101. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.11.011

24. Zhang J.J., Cao D.Y., Yang J.X., Shen K. Ovarian metastasis from nongynecologic primary sites: a retrospective analysis of 177 cases and 13-year experience. J Ovarian Res 2020;13(1):128. DOI: 10.1186/s13048-020-00714-8

25. Yasufuku I., Tsuchiya H., Fujibayashi S. et al. Oligometastasis of gastric cancer: a review. Cancers 2024;16:673. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16030673

26. Cheong J.H., Hyung W.J., Chen J. et al. Survival benefit of metastasectomy for krukenberg tumors from gastric cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2004;94(2):477–82. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.05.007

27. Zhang C., Hou W., Huang J. et al. Effects of metastasectomy and other factors on survival of patients with ovarian metastases from gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cell Biochem 2019;120(9):14486–98. DOI: 10.1002/jcb.28708


Review

Views: 566


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-5857 (Online)