A review of small bowel orthotopic bladder plasty techniques after radical cystectomy
https://doi.org/10.17650/2949-5857-2024-14-1-44-50
Abstract
In the Russian Federation, the prevalence of bladder cancer is increasing from year to year. Currently, the problem of urine drainage after radical cystectomy is urgent. The most optimal medical, social and psychological rehabilitation in such patients is provided by orthotopic plastic surgery of the bladder. At the same time, it is necessary to use the terminal sections of the ileum. The article presents overview data on the key points of the creation of the neobladder, historical information on the development of techniques for creating a urinary reservoir, various methods of creating neocystis from the ileum. Data on the advantages and disadvantages of certain techniques are presented.
About the Authors
K. R. Islamоv
Kazаn State Medical Academy – branch of Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Karim Rashitovich Islamov
36 Butlerova St., Kazan 420012
B. I. Gataullin
Kazаn State Medical Academy – branch of Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education, Ministry of Health of Russia; Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
36 Butlerova St., Kazan 420012
18 / 1 Kremlevskaya St., Kazan 420008
M. M. Nasrullaev
Kazаn State Medical Academy – branch of Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education, Ministry of Health of Russia; M.Z. Sigal Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary of Ministry of Health Care of Tatarstan Republic
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
36 Butlerova St., Kazan 420012
29 Siberian tract, Kazan 420029
R. G. Islamov
M.Z. Sigal Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary of Ministry of Health Care of Tatarstan Republic
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
29 Siberian tract, Kazan 420029
I. G. Gataullin
Kazаn State Medical Academy – branch of Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
36 Butlerova St., Kazan 420012
References
1. European Association of Urology Guidelines 2023. Available by: https://uroweb.org/eau-guidelines/ordering-the-eau-guidelines
2. Bladder cancer: Сlinical guidelines. Moscow: 2022. (In Russ.). Available by: https://oncology-association.ru/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/rak-mochevogo-puzyrya.pdf
3. Khan M.S., Omar K., Ahmed K. et al. Long-term oncological outcomes from an early phase randomised controlled three-arm trial of open, robotic, and laparoscopic radical cystectomy. Eur Urol 2020;77(1):110–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.10.027
4. Fahmy O., Khairul-Asri M.G., Schubert T. et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the oncological long-term outcomes after trimodality therapy and radical cystectomy with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 2018;36(2):43–53. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.10.002
5. Musayev T.N. Early complications of radical cystectomy with various types of urine diversion: prognostic factors analysis. Onkourologiya = Cancer Urology 2020;16(1):78–89. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17650/1726-9776-2020-16-1-78-89
6. Vasiliev O.N., Perepechai V.A., Ryzhkin A.V. Early and late postoperative complications after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Vestnik urologii = Bulletin of Urology 2019;7(2):24–50. (In Russ.). DOI: 10/21886/2308-6424-2019-7-2-24-50
7. Perepechai V.A., Vasilyev O.N., Spitsyn I.M., Kogan M.I. Predictors for morbidity of radical cystectomy and different types of urine derivation: 20-year experience of a surgery center. Cancer Urology 2016;12(1):42–57. DOI: 10.17650/1726-9776-2016-12-1-42-57
8. Atduev V.A., Gasrataliev V.E., Ledyaev D.S. et al. Predictors of postoperative complications of radical cystectomy. Onkologiya. Zhurnal imeni P.A. Gertsena = P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology 2019;8(5):348–57. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/onkolog20198051348
9. Prcic A., Begic E. Complications after ileal urinary derivations. Med Arch 2017;71(5):320–4. DOI: 10.5455/medarh.2017.71.320-324
10. Vasiliev O.N., Perepechai V.A., Ryzhkin A.V. Early and late postoperative complications after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Vestnik urologii = Bulletin of Urology 2019;7(2):24–50. (In Russ.). DOI: 10/21886/2308-6424-2019-7-2-24-50
11. Solovyov A.V., Zhuravlev Yu.I., Osintsev A.A. et al. Analysis of the results of treatment of bladder cancer after radical cystectomy. Questions of Urology and Andrology. 2016;4(2):50–2. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.20953/2307-6631-2016-2-50-52
12. Siracusano S., Zaka A., Bassi P. et al. Quality-of-life outcomes in female patients with ileal conduit or orthotopic neobladder urinary diversion: 6-Month results of a multicenter prospective study. Front Oncol 2022;12:855546. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.855546
13. Sitdykov E.N., Sitdykova M.E. Fundamentals of recovery of patients with bladder cancer. Kazan Medical Journal 1999;4:279–82. (In Russ.).
14. Kozlova P.S., Nyushko K.M., Gorbach V.A. et al. Methods of formation of neocysturethroanastomosis in orthotopic bladder plastic surgery after radical cystectomy. Issled Prakt Med = Research and Practice in Medicine 2020;7(2):109–15. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17709/2409-2231-2020-7-2-10
15. Nouhaud F.X., Coughlin G. Advantages of an intracorporeal W-shaped neobladder. Eur Urol Open Sci 2021;35:14–15. DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.09.020
16. Shimizu F., Muto S., Kitamura K. et al. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with modified vesica ileale Padovana (VIP) neobladder configuration using a hybrid approach: initial experience. J Pers Med 2023;13(5):802. DOI: 10.3390/jpm13050802
17. Guru K.A. Intracorporeal orthotopic neobladder: est modus in rebus. Eur Urol Open Sci 2021;35:16–17. DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.10.007
18. Symeonidis E.N., Falagas M.E., Dimitriadis F. Urinary tract infections in patients undergoing radical cystectomy and urinary diversion: challenges and considerations in antibiotic prophylaxis. Transl Androl Urol 2019;8(4):286–9. DOI: 10.21037/tau.2019.07.12
19. Simon J. Ectopia vesicae. Lancet 1852;2:568–70.
20. Tizzoni E., Foggi A. Die Wiederherstellung der Harnblase. Zentralbl Chir 1888;15:921–6. (In German).
21. Kolontarev K.B., Medvedev V. L., Semenyakin I.V. et al. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy: guidelines. Moscow: ABV-press, 2018; 36 p. (In Russ.).
22. Zaayer F.J. Discussion: intra-abdominale plastieken. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1911;65:836.
23. Musaev T.N. Orthotopic urine removal after radical cystectomy. Georgian Medical News 2017;263(2):29–33. (In Russ.).
24. Sitdykov E.N. Replacement of the bladder with an isolated intestinal loop in cancer and total papillomatosis. Abstract of the dissertation for the degree of doctor of medical sciences. Kazan, 1971. (In Russ.).
25. Galeev R.K. Cystectomy in bladder cancer patients. Voprosy onkologii 1992;38(9):1118–24. (In Russ.).
26. Nesterov S.N., Hanaliev B.V., Rogachikov V.V. et al. Intestinal plastic bladder. Vestinik Nationalnogo mediko-khirurgicheskogo tsentra imeni N.I. Pirogova = Bulletin of Pirogov National Medical and Surgical Center 2016;11(3):105–10. (In Russ.).
27. Studer U.E., Danuser H., Merz V.W. et al. Experience in 100 patients with an ileal low pressure bladder substitute combined with an afferent tubular isoperistaltic segment. J Urol 1995;154(1):49–56.
28. Lavallée E., Wiklund P. The Studer neobladder: an established and reproducible technique for intracorporeal urinary diversion. Eur Urol Open Sci 2021;35:18–20. DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.09.019
29. Elmajian D.A., Stein J.P., Esrig D. et al. The Kock ileal neobladder: updated experience in 295 male patients. J Urol 1996;156(3):920–5. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)65663-5
30. Hautmann R.E., Egghart G., Frohneberg D., Miller K. The ileal neobladder. J Urol 1988;139(1):39–42. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)42283-x
31. Pagano F., Artibani W., Aragona F. et al. La vejiga ileal Padovana (VIP): Técnica quirúrgica, evaluación funcional a largo plazo, complicaciones y conducta a seguir [Vesica ileale Padovana (VIP): surgical technique, long-term functional evaluation, complications and management]. Arch Esp Urol 1997;50(7):785–93. (In Spanish).
32. Atduev V.A., Lyubarskaya Yu.O., Ledyaev D.S. et al. Long-term functional results of orthotopic urine derivation by Studer and VIP after radical cystectomy in women. Vestinik urologii = Bulletin of Urology 2020;8(2):10–20. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.21886/2308-6424-2020-8-2-10-20
33. Sheybaee Moghaddam F., Ghoreifi A., Djaladat H. Comparative performance of the different orthotopic urinary diversions. Curr Opin Urol 2022;32(5):554–60. DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001016
34. Matveev B.P., Figurin K.M., Karyakin O.B. Bladder cancer. Moscow: Verdana, 2001. 254 p. (In Russ.).
35. Lavallée E., Sfakianos J., Mehrazin R., Wiklund P. Detailed Description of the Karolinska technique for intracorporeal Studer neobladder reconstruction. J Endourol 2022;36(S2):67–72. DOI: 10.1089/end.2022.0248
36. Lavallée E., Dovey Z., Pathak P. et al. Functional and oncological outcomes of female pelvic organ-preserving robot-assisted radical cystectomy. Eur Urol Open Sci 2021;36:34–40. DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.11.010
37. Perepechaj V.A., Kogan M.I. Patent № 2371102, A61B 17/00 (2006.01). Inverting orthotopic ileocystoplasty technique in short mesoileum: No. 2008117688/14: application 04.05.2008: published 27.10.2009, bul. No 30. (In Russ.).
38. Vasilev O.N., Perepechaj V.A., Kogan M.I. Patent № 2731890, A61B 17/00(2006.01), 17/11(2006.01). Method of orthotopic ileocystoplasty with insufficient length of mesentery of small intestine: No. 2020103458: application 27.01.2020: published 09.09.2020, bul. No 25. (In Russ.).
39. Chissov V.I., Rusakov I.G., Teplov A.A., Perepechin D.V. Patent № 2290092, A61B 17/00(2006.01). Method for developing orthotopic bladder’s reservoir: No. 2005130592/14: application 03.10.2005: published 27.12.2006, bul. No. 36. (In Russ.).
40. Komjakov B.K., Sergeev A.V., Fadeev V.A. et al. Patent № 2408305, A61B 17/11(2006.01). Method of ortotopic iliocystoplasty in patients with Meckel’s diverticulum, freely located in abdominal cavity: No. 2009121987/14: application 08.06.2009: published 10.01.2011, bul. No. 1. (In Russ.).
41. Vasil’chenko M.I. Patent № 2337630, A61B 17/00(2006.01). Method of orthotopic enteral cystoplasty: No. 2007112608/14: application 5.04.2007: published 10.11.2008, bul. No. 31. (In Russ.).
42. Hussein A.A., Ahmed Y.E., Kozlowski J.D. et al. Robot-assisted approach to ‘W’-configuration urinary diversion: a step-by-step technique. BJU Int 2017;120(1):152–7. DOI: 10.1111/bju.13824
Review
Views:
279
Email this article 