Preview

Surgery and Oncology

Advanced search

The main causative agents of infectious complications during reconstructive surgery using allomaterials in patients with breast cancer

https://doi.org/10.17650/2686-9594-2023-13-2-38-45

Abstract

Introduction: Surgical site infections (SSI) are one of the key problems in surgical practice. Despite the achievements of modern medicine, ongoing preventive measures, the incidence of wound infection remains quite high. This is especially relevant for oncoplastic surgery, since in most cases the installation of foreign materials (expanders, implants, meshes) is required to achieve a satisfactory cosmetic result.

The purpose of the study: to identify the most common cause of infectious complications after reconstructive operations on the mammary gland using endoprostheses.

Materials and methods: In a retrospective review of 526 consecutive implant-based breast reconstructions at a single institution from June 2020 to June 2022 was conducted. The frequency of development of infectious complications was assessed, as well as the taxonomic structure of the main pathogens that were isolated in the department of oncomammology in 2020–2022.

Results: The incidence of infectious complications that led to the loss of the endoprosthesis during reconstructive surgery on the mammary gland was 6.7 %. The main causative agents of SSI leading to the loss of implants and the need for reoperations were Corynebacterium striatum (35.2 %) and Staphylococcus aureus (27.2 %). The spectrum of the most common pathogens that led to the loss of implants corresponded to the flora most often detected during bacterial culture in the department. The probability of implant loss was higher in the group of patients who underwent chemotherapy (14 of 197, 7.1 %) or chemoradiotherapy (14 of 188, 7.4 %) compared with patients who did not receive specific anticancer treatment (7 of 141, 4.9 %). However, taking patients who did not receive drug or radiation treatment as a reference group, statistical significance could not be achieved (p = 0.56 in the chemotherapy group and p = 0.49 in the chemoradiotherapy group).

Conclusions: Our own experience has shown that, despite the current preventive measures, the frequency of infectious complications remains quite high. In the etiological structure of SSI pathogens, microorganisms of the genera Staphylococcus and Corynebacterium predominate. The use of broad-spectrum antibiotics in perioperative prophylaxis did not guarantee the absence of SSI in the postoperative period. An analysis of the sensitivity of isolated pathogens to antibacterial drugs, an assessment of the effectiveness of various antibiotic regimens in the future may allow us to develop an optimal antibiotic prophylaxis scheme for infectious complications during breast reconstructive surgery, therefore, further prospective studies in this direction are needed.

About the Authors

A. E. Gulyaeva
N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Anna Eduardovna Gulyaeva

1 Ostrovityanova St., Moscow 117997



E. A. Kim
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia; I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478; Build. 2, 8 Trubetskaya St., Moscow 119991



Z. V. Grigorievskaya
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478



D. A. Denchik
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478



K. V. Gagulaeva
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478



D. V. Khaylenko
N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia; N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

1 Ostrovityanova St., Moscow 117997; 24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478



A. A. Rumyantsev
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478



A. V. Petrovsky
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia; I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478; Build. 2, 8 Trubetskaya St., Moscow 119991



References

1. Banuelos J., Sabbagh M.D., Roh S.G. et al. Infections following immediate implant-based breast reconstruction: a case-control study over 11 years. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019;144(6):1270–7. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006202

2. Ozturk C.N., Ozturk C., Soucise A. et al. Expander/implant removal after breast reconstruction: analysis of risk factors and timeline. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2018;42:64–72. DOI: 10.1007/s00266-017-1031-8

3. Monroig K., Ghosh K., Marquez J.E. et al. Do postoperative prophylactic antibiotics reduce highly virulent infections? An analysis of 660 tissue expander breast reconstructions. Ann Plast Surg 2020;85(S1, Suppl 1):S50–3. DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002325

4. Phillips B.T., Fourman M.S., Bishawi M. et al. Are prophylactic postoperative antibiotics necessary for immediate breast reconstruction? Results of a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Am Coll Surg 2016;222(6):1116–24. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.02.018

5. Clayton J.L., Bazakas A., Lee C.N. et al. Once is not enough: with holding postoperative prophylactic antibiotics in prosthetic breast reconstruction is associated with an increased risk of infection. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;130(3):495–502. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31825dbefe

6. Gahm J., Ljung Konstantinidou A., Lagergren J. et al. Effectiveness of single vs multiple doses of prophylactic intravenous antibiotics in implant-based breast reconstruction: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA NETw Open 2022;5(9):e2231583. DOI: 10.1001/jamaNETworkopen.2022.31583

7. Weichman K.E., Levine S.M., Wilson S.C. et al. Antibiotic selection for the treatment of infectious complications of implantbased breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2013;71(2):140–3. DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3182590924


Review

Views: 337


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-5857 (Online)