Preview

Surgery and Oncology

Advanced search

Intensification of neoadjuvant therapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

https://doi.org/10.17650/2686-9594-2021-11-2-19-28

Abstract

The aim of the study: to increase the frequency of achieving pathologic complete response and increase disease-free survival in the investigational group of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer T3(MRF+)–4N0–2M0 by developing a new strategy for neoadjuvant therapy.
Materials and methods. In total, 414 patients were assigned to treatment. Control group I included 89 patients who underwent radiotherapy (RT) 52–56 Gy/26–28 fractions with concurrent capecitabine twice daily 5 days per week. Control group II included 160 patients who underwent RT 52–56 Gy/26–28 fractions with concurrent capecitabine twice daily 5 days per week and oxaliplatin once a week, during the course of RT. Study group III consisted of 165 patients. This group combined RT 52–56 Gy/26–28 fractions with concurrent capecitabine twice daily 5 days per week and additional consecutive CapOx cycles. This group was divided into 2 subgroups: subgroup IIIa included 106 patients with consolidating chemotherapy (after CRT); subgroup IIIb included 59 patients who underwent “sandwich” treatment. Therapy consisted of conducting from 1 to 2 cycles of induction CapOx (up to CRT) and from 1 to 2 cycles of consolidating CapOx with an interval of 7 days. In the interval between the courses of drug therapy, RT 52–56 Gy/26–28 fractions was performed. According to the results of the control examination, further treatment tactics were determined. The primary end points were 5-year disease-free survival and the achievement of a pathologic complete response.
Results. Pathologic complete response was significantly more often recorded in patients in the investigational group III (17.48 %; p = 0.021) compared with control groups (7.95 % in the I group and 8.28 % in the II group). 5-year disease-free survival in patients in the study groups was: 71.5 % in the III group, 65.6 % in the II group and 56.9 % in the I group.
Conclusion. The shift in emphasis on strengthening the neoadjuvant effect on the tumor and improving approaches to drug therapy regimens have significantly improved disease-free survival of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

About the Authors

Z. Z. Mamedli
Department of Proctology, Research Institute of Clinical Oncology, N. N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478



A. V. Polynovskiy
Department of Proctology, Research Institute of Clinical Oncology, N. N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Andrey Vladimirovich Polynovskiy

24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478



D. V. Kuzmichev
Department of Proctology, Research Institute of Clinical Oncology, N. N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478



S. I. Tkachev
Department of Radiotherapy, Research Institute of Clinical and Experimental Radiology, N. N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478



A. A. Aniskin
Department of Proctology, Research Institute of Clinical Oncology, N. N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478



References

1. Jalil O., Claydon L.A. Review of neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in locally advanced rectal cancer. J Gastrointest Cancer 2015;46:219–36.

2. Nafedzov I.O., Chernyshov S.V., Ponomarenko A.A. et al. Rehabilitation of patients with low anterior resection syndrome. Koloproktologiya = Coloproctology 2021;2(76):57–64. (In Russ.).

3. Kovaleva E.V., Sinyukova G.T., Danzanova T.Yu. et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the diagnosis and assessment of treatment efficacy in patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Vestnik rentgenologii i radiologii = Bulletin of Radiology 2020;101(6): 324–32. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.20862/0042-4676-2020-101-6-324-332.

4. Kovaleva E.V., Sinyukova G.T., Danzanova T.Yu. et al. Utility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Onkologicheskiy zhurnal: luchevaya diagnostika, luchevaya terapiya = Journal of Oncology: Diagnostic Radiology and Radiotherapy 2019;2(1):43–50. (In Russ.).

5. Kovaleva E.V., Sinyukova G.T., Danzanova T.Yu. et al. Contrastenhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Koloproktologiya = Coloproctology 2018;1(63):36–42. (In Russ.).

6. Habr-Gama A., Perez R.O., Nadalin W. et al. Operative versus nonoperative treatment for stage 0 distal rectal cancer following chemoradiation therapy: longterm results. Ann Surg 2004;240:711–7; discussion 717–8.

7. Maas M., Nelemans P.J., Valentini V. et al. Long-term outcome in patients with a pathological complete response after chemoradiation for rectal cancer: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Oncol 2010;11(9):835–44.

8. Garcia-Aguilar J., Chow O.S., Smith D.D. et al. Effect of adding mFOLFOX6 after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2015;16:957–66.

9. Petrelli F., Sgroi G., Sarti E. et al. Increasing the interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of published studies. Ann Surg 2016;263(3):458–64.


Review

Views: 566


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-5857 (Online)