Combined and expanded operations in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer and affected retroperitoneal lymph nodes
https://doi.org/10.17650/2686-9594-2020-10-2-11-18
Abstract
Objective: to analyze short-term and long-term outcomes of expanded surgeries in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer and to identify factors affecting their overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).
Materials and methods. This retrospective study included patients with recurrent ovarian cancer stage I–IV less than 80 years of age who was treated in the Department of Gynecologic Oncology, N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, between 2015 and 2017. Other inclusion criteria were as follows: time to relapse more than 12 months and no chemotherapy during the last 6 months or more. We analyzed the main perioperative parameters, OS, PFS, and prognostic factors affecting OS and PFS.
Results. This study included 55 patients. Of them, 44 (80 %) women have undergone complete cytoreductive surgery, whereas 11 (20 %) women have undergone optimal cytoreductive surgery. The median duration of surgery was 210 minutes (range: 60–390 minutes), median blood loss was 400 mL (range: 30–4500 mL). Postoperative complications were observed in 23 (41.2 %) patients; 5 (9.1 %) patients developed grade IIIB complications. Median follow-up time was 30.3 months (range: 7.5–67.1 months). Three-year OS was 73.7 % and three-year PFS was 30.7 %. More than one line of chemotherapy before repeated cytoreductive surgery was found to be a negative factor affecting OS (hazard ratio 2.749; 95 % confidence interval 1.059–7.138; p = 0.038). The primary ECOG performance status had a significant impact on PFS (hazard ratio 0.543; 95 % confidence interval 0.347–0.851; p = 0.008).
Conclusions. Poor ECOG status and more than one line of chemotherapy before repeated cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer relapse were demonstrated to have a negative impact on survival in this group of patients. However, in some patients, repeated cytoreductive surgeries ensured long-term remission.
About the Authors
Kh. I. MamazhonovRussian Federation
23 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478
S. O. Nikogosyan
Russian Federation
23 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478
V. V. Kuznetsov
Russian Federation
23 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478
A. S. Shevchuk
Russian Federation
23 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478
O. A. Egenov
Russian Federation
23 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478
References
1. Bickell N.A., Egorova N., Prasad- Hayes M. et al. Secondary surgery versus chemotherapy for recurrent ovarian cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 2018;41(5):458–64.
2. Gockley A., Melamed A., Cronin A. et al. Outcomes of secondary cytoreductive surgery for patients with platinumsensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019;221(6):625e1–e14. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.06.009.
3. Felsinger M., Minar L., Weinberger V. et al. Secondary cytoreductive surgery – viable treatment option in the management of platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2018;228:154–60. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.06.036.
4. Coleman R.L. Secondary surgical cytoreduction for recurrent ovarian cancer. Reply. N Engl J Med 2020;382(7):686. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc1916477.
5. Coleman R.L., Spirtos N.M., Enserro D. et al. Secondary surgical cytoreduction for recurrent ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 2019;381(20):1929–39. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1902626.
6. Chi D.S., Ramirez P.T., Teitcher J.B. et al. Prospective study of the correlation between postoperative computed tomography scan and primary surgeon assessment in patients with advanced ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal carcinoma reported to have undergone primary surgical cytoreduction to residual disease 1 cm or less. J Clin Oncol 2007;25(31):4946–51.
7. Schorge J.O., McCann C., Del Carmen M.G. Surgical debulking of ovarian cancer: what difference does it make? Rev Obstet Gynecol 2010;3(3):111–7.
8. Clavien P.A., Barkun J., de Oliveira M.L. et al. The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 2009;250(2):187–96. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2.
9. Querleu D., Morrow C.P. Classification of radical hysterectomy. Lancet Oncol 2008;9(3):297–303. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70074-3.
10. Chi D.S., McCaughty K., Diaz J.P. et al. Guidelines and selection criteria for secondary cytoreductive surgery in patients with recurrent, platinumsensitive epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Cancer 2006;106(9):1933–9. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21845.
11. Gallotta V., Bruno M., Conte C. et al. Book P114 Guidelines and selection criteria for lymphadenectomy in recurrent ovarian cancer patients. BMJ 2019.
12. Ushijima K. Treatment for recurrent ovarian cancer-at first relapse. J Oncol 2010:497429. DOI: 10.1155/2010/497429.
13. Pignata S., Pisano C., Di Napoli M. et al. Treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer 2019;125(Suppl 24):4609–15. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32500.