Outcomes of extensive surgeries in combination treatment of stage III–IV ovarian cancer
https://doi.org/10.17650/2686-9594-2020-10-1-43-49
Abstract
Objective: to evaluate short-term and long-term outcomes of lymph node dissection in patients with stage III–IV ovarian cancer.
Materials and methods. This retrospective study included patients with stage III–IV ovarian cancer who have undergone either complete or optimal cytoreduction. Patients in the experimental group additionally had lymph node dissection, whereas patients in the control group had surgery without lymph node dissection. We evaluated 3‑year relapse-free survival (primary outcome measure), 3‑year overall survival, incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications, and frequency of lymph node lesions.
Results. The study included 272 patients: 43 women in the experimental group and 229 women in the control group. Intraoperative complications were significantly more common in patients who had lymph node dissection compared to those who had cytoreductive surgery alone (37.2 % vs 16.6 % respectively; р = 0.0001). The incidence of postoperative complications did not vary significantly between the groups (27.9 % in the experimental group vs 16.2 % in the control group; р = 0.128). Thirty-three patients (76.7 %) were found to have metastasis in the lymph nodes excised. The three-year overall survival rate was 82.6 % among patients who had lymph node dissection and 75.7 % among patients who had no lymph node dissection (р = 0.306). The three-year relapse-free survival rate was 26.2 % in the experimental group and 38.4 % in the control group (р = 0.858).
Conclusions. Systemic lymph node dissection does not improve long-term outcomes and increases the incidence of intraoperative complications in patients with stage III–IV ovarian cancer undergoing complete or optimal cytoreduction.
About the Authors
Kh. I. MamazhonovRussian Federation
24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478, Russia
S. O. Nikogosyan
Russian Federation
24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478, Russia
A. S. Shevchuk
Russian Federation
24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478, Russia
V. V. Kuznetsov
Russian Federation
24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478, Russia
References
1. Harter P., Sehouli J., Lorusso D. et al. A randomized trial of lymphadenectomy in patients with advanced ovarian neoplasms. N Engl J Med 2019;380(9):822–32. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1808424.
2. Panici P.B., Maggioni A., Hacker N. et al. Systematic aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy versus resection of bulky nodes only in optimally debulked advanced ovarian cancer: a randomized clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97(8):560–6. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dji102.
3. Zhou J., Shan G., Chen Y. The effect of lymphadenectomy on survival and recurrence in patients with ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2016;46(8):718–26.
4. Clavien P.A., Barkun J., de Oliveira M.L. et al. The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 2009;250(2):187–96. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2.
5. Chang S.J., Bristow R.E., Ryu H.S. Prognostic significance of systematic lymphadenectomy as part of primary debulking surgery in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2012;126(3):381–6.
6. Legge F., Petrillo M., Adamo V. et al. Epithelial ovarian cancer relapsing as isolated lymph node disease: natural history and clinical outcome. BMC Cancer 2008;8:367. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-8-367.
7. Blanchard P., Plantade A., Pages C. et al. Isolated lymph node relapse of epithelial ovarian carcinoma: outcomes and prognostic factors. Gynecol Oncol 2007;104(1):41–5.
8. Berek J.S. Lymph node-positive stage IIIC ovarian cancer: a separate entity? Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009;19(Suppl 2):S18–20. DOI: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181bf8111.
9. Gasimli K., Braicu E.I., Nassir M. et al. Lymph node involvement pattern and survival differences of FIGO IIIC and FIGO IIIA1 ovarian cancer patients after primary complete tumor debulking surgery: a 10-year retrospective analysis of the Tumor Bank Ovarian Cancer Network. Ann Surg Oncol 2016;23(4):1279–86. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-4959-4.
10. Sahin H., Meydanli M.M., Sari M.E. et al. Does the primary route of spread have a prognostic significance in stage III non-serous epithelial ovarian cancer? J Ovarian Res 2018;11(1):21. DOI: 10.1186/s13048-018-0393-0.