The diagnostic value of using nomograms in predicting the occurrence of colorectal anastomosis leakage (a literature review)
https://doi.org/10.17650/2686-9594-2019-9-3-27-33
Abstract
The anastomosis leakage is one of the most terrible complications of rectal cancer surgery. The anastomosis leakage rate after low anterior resection may exceed 20 %. The anastomosis leakage increases postoperative mortality, length of hospitalization, requires the formation of a temporary or permanent colostomy, which impairs the quality of life of patients. In recent years, some authors have suggested using a nomogram, a prognostic algorithm in the form of a graphic image showing the probability of a certain outcome individually for each patient. This review presents literature data on the use of nomograms in predicting the occurrence of colorectal anastomosis leakage after rectal cancer surgery.
About the Authors
M. V. Alekseev
A.N. Ryzhikh State Scientific Center of Coloproctology, Ministry of Health of Russia; Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
2 Salyama Adilya St., 123423 Moscow;Build. 1, 2/1 Barrikadnaya St., Moscow 125993.
Yu. A. Shelygin
A.N. Ryzhikh State Scientific Center of Coloproctology, Ministry of Health of Russia; Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
2 Salyama Adilya St., 123423 Moscow; Build. 1, 2/1 Barrikadnaya St., Moscow 125993.
E. G. Rybakov
A.N. Ryzhikh State Scientific Center of Coloproctology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
2 Salyama Adilya St., 123423 Moscow.
References
1. Matthiessen P., Hallbook O., Rutegard J. et al. Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg 2007;246(2):207—14. DOI: 10.1097/sla.0b013e3180603024.
2. Balkarov A.A., Rybakov E.G., Ponomarenko A.A. The reinforcement of colorectal anastomosis as method of prophylaxis of anastomotic leakage. Koloproktologiya = Coloproctology 2018;4(66):16—25. (In Russ.).
3. Koperna T. Cost-effectiveness of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resections for rectal cancer: a call for benchmarking. Arch Surg 2003;138(12):1334—8. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.138.12.1334.
4. Kim M.J., Kim Y.S., Park S.C. et al. Risk factors for permanent stoma after rectal cancer surgery with temporary ileostomy. Surgery 2016;159(3):721 —7. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.09.011.
5. Lu Z.R., Rajendran N., Lynch A.C. et al. Anastomotic leaks after restorative resections for rectal cancer compromise cancer outcomes and survival. Dis Colon Rectum 2016;59(3):236—44. DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000554.
6. Lantsov I.S., Moskalev A.I., Sushkov O.I. Loop ileostomy closure (a literature rewiev). Koloproktologiya = Coloproctology 2018;2(64):102—10. (In Russ.).
7. Tan W.S., Tang C.L., Shi L., Eu K.W. Meta-analysis of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2009;96:462-72.
8. Huser N., Michalski C.W., Erkan M. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of defunctioning stoma in low rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 2008;248:52-60. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.6594.
9. Giannakopoulos G.F., Veenhof A.A., van der Peet D.L. et al. Morbidity and complications of protective loop ileostomy. Colorectal Dis 2009;11:609-12. DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01690.x.
10. Dekker J.W., Liefers G.J., de Mol V.O.J. et al. Predicting the risk of anastomotic leakage in left-sided colorectal surgery using a colon leakage score. J Surg Res 2011;166(1):27—34. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.11.004.
11. Frasson M., Flor-Lorente B., Rodriguez J.L. et al. Risk factors for anastomotic leak after colon resection for cancer: multivariate analysis and nomogram from a multicentric, prospective, national study with 3193 patients. Ann Surg 2015;262(2):321—30. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000973.
12. Rahbari N.N., Weitz J., Hohenberger W. et al. Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery 2010;147(3):339—51. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.10.012.
13. Kim C.H., Lee S.Y., Kim H.R. et al. Nomogram prediction of anastomotic leakage and determination of an effective surgical strategy for reducing anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2017;2017:4510561. DOI: 10.1155/2017/4510561.
14. Hoshino N., Hida K., Sakai Y. et al. Nomogram for predicting anastomotic leak-age after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Int J Color Dis 2018;33(4):411—8. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-018-2970-5.
15. Zheng H., Wu Z., Wu Y. et al. Laparoscopic surgery may decrease the risk of clinical anastomotic leakage and a nomogram to predict anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 2019;34(2):319-28. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-018-3199-z.
16. Klose J., Tarantino I., von Fournier A. et al. A nomogram to predict anastomotic leakage in open rectal surgery-hope or hype? J Gastrointest Surg 2018;22(9):1619— 30. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-018-3782-1.
17. Penna M., Hompes R., Arnold S. et al. Incidence and risk factors for anastomotic failure in 1594 patients treated by transanal total mesorectal excision: results from the International TaTME Registry. Ann Surg 2019;269(4):700—11. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002653.
18. Crebbin W., Beasley S.W., Watters D.A. Clinical decision making: how surgeons do it. ANZ J Surg 2013;83:422—8. DOI: 10.1111/ans.12180.
19. Clavien P.A., Dindo D. Surgeon’s intuition: is it enough to assess patients’ surgical risk? World J Surg 2007;31:1909— 11. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-007-9145-9.
20. Karliczek A., Harlaar N.J., Zeebregts C.J. et al. Surgeons lack predictive accuracy for anastomotic leakage in gastrointestinal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009;24(5):569—76. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-009-0658-6.
Review
Views:
556
Email this article 