Comparative analysis of quality of life after laparoscopic and open procedures for upper and middle rectal cancer

Background. In the last decades laparoscopic technologies have been actively implemented for rectal cancer surgery, however randomized control trials have not demonstrated overt advantages of laparoscopic technique comparing to open surgery. The improvement of quality of life is expected to be one of advantages of laparoscopic approach. Objective: a prospective study of the dependence of the quality of life on the type of operative access (open or laparoscopic) in patients with rectal cancer after low anterior resection of the rectum. Materials and methods. There were 30 patients in the study: 20 of them were operated laparoscopically and 10 were underwent open surgery. The current versions of the general questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30 and the special module for patients with colorectal cancer EORTC QLQ-CR29 were used in the study, that were filled on the day before the surgery and also on days 3, 7 and 60 after the surgery. Results. In the first 7 days after laparoscopic operations patients had less frequent dysuric dysfunctions (p = 0.047), less pain syndrome (p = 0.0005) and flatulence (p = 0.007) comparing to open operations. At 60 days after surgery patients that were operated laparoscopically were satisfied by their appearance more often (p = 0.047) than patients after open surgery, more rarely had anxiety (p = 0.007) and discomfort in the area of postoperative wounds (p = 0.079). Conclusion. It has been proven that laparoscopic surgery of rectal cancer evidently improves quality of life in postoperative period.

1. Dulskas A., Miliauskas P., Tikuisis R. et al. The functional results of radical rectal cancer surgery: review of the literature. Acta Chir Belg 2016;116(1):1–10. DOI: 10.108000015458.2015.1136482. PMID: 27385133.

2. Van der Pas M. H., Haglind E., Cuesta M. A. et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2013;14(3):210–8. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70016-0. PMID: 23395398.

3. McKay G. D., Morgan M. J., Wong S. K. et al. Improved short-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open resection for colon and rectal cancer in an area health service: a multicenter study. Dis Colon Rectum 2012;55(1):42–50. DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318239341f. PMID: 22156866.

4. Chen K., Cao G., Chen B. et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of classic randomized controlled trials and high-quality Nonrandomized Studies in the last 5 years. Int J Surg 2017;(39):1–10. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu. 2016.12.123. PMID: 28087370.

5. Vennix S., Pelzers L., Bouvy N. et al. Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;15(4):301–4. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005200.pub3. PMID: 24737031.

6. Asoglu O., Matlim T., Karanlik H. et al. Impact of laparoscopic surgery on bladder and sexual function after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2009;23(2):296–303. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-008-9870-7. PMID: 18398647.

7. Bonjer H. J., Deijen C. L., Abis G. A. et al. A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2015;29(2):334–48. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc1505367. PMID: 26154803.

8. Jeong S. Y., Park J. W., Nam B. H. et al. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2014;15(7):767–74. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70205–0. PMID: 24837215.

9. Kennedy R. H., Francis E. A., Wharton R. et al. Multicenter randomized controlled trial of conventional versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme: EnROL. J Clin Oncol 2014;32(17):1804–11. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.3694. PMID: 24799480.

10. TNM: классификация злокачественных опухолей. 7-е изд. Под ред. L. H. Sobin, M. K. Gospodarowicz, Ch. Wittekind. М.: Логосфера, 2011. 304 с. [TNM: classification of malignant tumors. 7th edn. Eds.: L. H. Sobin, M. K. Gospodaro wicz, Ch. Wittekind. Moscow: Logosfera, 2011. 304 p. (In Russ.)].