Effect of standardized algorithm for perioperative management on the results of right-sided hemicolectomy in elderly patients
https://doi.org/10.17650/2220-3478-2016-6-2-24-28
Abstract
Introduction. Standardized protocols for perioperative management of patients are increasingly used in colorectal surgery. We compared the results of right-sided hemicolectomy in elderly patients before and after implementation of this protocol.
Materials and methods. The results of a prospective database of the department of surgical oncology of Treatment and Rehabilitation Center for 2009–2016 years were analyzed. A comparative analysis of 86 case of elective right-sided hemicolectomy was performed in patients aged 60 years and over as a part of standardized protocol for perioperative management of patients, and 34 similar surgeries carried out earlier without compliance with the protocol. Clinically, there was no significant differences between groups.
Results. In the study group we revealed statistically significant decrease in the number of sever (grade III–V by Clavien–Dindo) postoperative complications and mortality from 33 % to 13 % and from 12 % to 1 %, respectively. Also, despite the fact that surgical operations in the test group were carried out by less experienced surgeons, introduction of the unified surgical technique reduced median duration of the surgery from 185 to 165 minutes.
Conclusion. Introduction of the standardized protocol for perioperative management of elderly and old patients, that need right-sided hemicolectomy, reduces the number of complications and lethal cases.
About the Authors
V. K. Lyadov
Treatment and Rehabilitation Center of the Ministry of Health of Russia; 3 Ivan’kovskoe Shosse, Moscow, 125367, Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. V. Kochatkov
Treatment and Rehabilitation Center of the Ministry of Health of Russia; 3 Ivan’kovskoe Shosse, Moscow, 125367, Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. Z. Negardinov
Treatment and Rehabilitation Center of the Ministry of Health of Russia; 3 Ivan’kovskoe Shosse, Moscow, 125367, Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Состояние онкологической помощи населению России в 2014 году. Под ред. А. Д. Каприна, В. В. Старинского, Г. В. Петровой. М., 2015. 236 с. [Oncologic assistance to the population of Russia in 2014. Eds. by: А. D. Kaprin, V. V. Starinskiy, G. V. Petrova. Мoscow, 2015. 236 p. (In Russ.)].
2. Статистика злокачественных новообразований в России и странах СНГ в 2012 году. Под ред. М. И. Давыдова, Е. М. Аксель. М., 2014. 226 с. [Statistics of malignant tumors in Russia and CIS countries in 2012. Eds. by: М. I. Davydov, Е. М. Аksel’. Мoscow, 2014. 226 p. (In Russ.)].
3. Odermatt M., Miskovic D., Flashman K. et al. Major postoperative complications following elective resections for colorectal cancer decrease long-term survival but not the time to recurrence. Colorectal Dis 2015;17(2):141–9.
4. Лядов К. В., Кочатков А. В., Лядов В. К. Концепция ускоренной послеоперационной реабилитации в лечении опухолевых заболеваний ободочной кишки. Хирургия 2015; (6):84–90. [Lyadov K. V., Kochatkov А. V., Lyadov V. K. Concept of the accelerated post- operation rehabilitation in the treatment of tumor diseases of the segmented intestine. Khirurgiya = Surgery 2015;(6):84–90. (In Russ.)].
5. Kehlet H., Mogensen T. Hospital stay of 2 days after open sigmoidectomy with a multimodal rehabilitation programme. Br J Surg 1999;86(2):227–30.
6. Levy B. F., Scott M. J., Fawcett W. J., Rockall T. A. 23-hour-stay laparoscopic colectomy. Dis Сolon Rectum 2009;52(7):1239–43.
7. Lassen K., Soop M., Nygren J. et al. Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group recommendations. Arch Surg 2009;144(10):961–9.
8. TNM classification of malignant tumours. By eds.: L. H. Sobin, M. K. Gospodarowicz, C. Wittekind. 7th edn. Wiley-Blackwell, 2009. 336 p.
9. Dindo D., Demartines N., Clavien P. A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240(2):205–13.
10. Mastracci T. M., Cohen Z., Senagore A. Canadian Association of General Surgeons and American College of Surgeons Evidence- Based Reviews in Surgery. Fast-track programs in colonic surgery. Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery. Can J Surg 2008;51(1):70–2.
11. Bagnall N. M., Malietzis G., Kennedy R. H. et al. A systematic review of enhanced recovery care after colorectal surgery in elderly patients. Colorectal Dis 2014;16(12):947– 56.
12. Holte K., Foss N. B., Svensen C. et al. Epidural anesthesia, hypotension, and changes in intravascular volume. Anesthesiology 2004;100(2):281–6.
13. Slim K., Vicaut E., Panis Y., Chipponi J. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of colorectal surgery with or without mechanical bowel preparation. Br J Surg 2004;91(9):1125–30.
14. Walker K. J., Smith A. F. Premedication for anxiety in adult day surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;4:CD002192.
15. Nygren J. The metabolic effects of fasting and surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2006;20(3):429–38.
16. Andersen H. K., Lewis S. J., Thomas S. Early enteral nutrition within 24h of colorectal surgery versus later commencement of feeding for postoperative complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;4: CD004080.
17. Han-Geurts I. J., Hop W. C., Kok N. F. et al. Randomized clinical trial of the impact of early enteral feeding on postoperative ileus and recovery. Br J Surg 2007;94(5):555–61.
18. Kehlet H., Wilmore D. W. Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg 2002;183(6):630–41.
Review
Views:
763
Email this article 