Preview

Surgery and Oncology

Advanced search

Comparative analysis of laparoscopic low rectal resections

https://doi.org/10.17650/2220-3478-2015-5-2-27-35

Abstract

Objective: to study the immediate results of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection (ISR) and ultralow anterior resection (ULAR) of the rectum.
Subjects and methods. The results of surgical treatment in 42 patients operated on in the Saint Petersburg Clinical Research-Practical Center for Specialized Medical (Oncology) Cares in March 2014 to January 2015 are given. The inclusion criteria were the lower edge of cT1–3N0 adenocarcinoma 2-5 cm above the dentate line and no signs of invasion into the sphincter and levators. All the patients were divided into 2 groups: 1) 24 patients who had undergone laparoscopic ISR; 2) 18 patients who had laparoscopic ULAR. Both groups were matched for gender, age, body mass index, and CR-POSSUM predicted mortality scores. Thirty-two patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
Results. The mean duration of operations did not differ significantly in the groups: 206 ± 46 and 216 ± 24 min (р = 0.72). The differences in the mean volume of blood loss were also insignificant: 85 and 113 ml (р = 0.93). Circular and distal resection margins were intact in all the cases. In 18 (75 %) patients in Group 1 and in 14 (77.8 %) patients in Group 2, the quality of total mesorectumectomy (TME) was rated as grade 3 according to the Quirk criteria (p = 0.83). In Group 1, complications requiring no reoperation occurred in 5 (20.8 %) cases: anastomotic incompetence in 3 (12.5 %) cases, anastomotic stricture with further bougienage in 1 (4.2 %), and urinary retention in 1 (4.2 %). In Group 2, postoperative coтplications were also observed in 5 (27.8 %) cases: necrosis of the brought-out bowel in 2 (11.1 %) patients and coloanal incompetence in 1 (5.6 %) required reoperation; 2 (11.1 %) patients underwent bougienage due to established anastomotic stricture. One month postoperatively, the Wexner constipation scoring system was used to rate the degree of encopresis: anal incontinence turned out to be significantly higher in Group 2 and amounted to 9.3 versus 6.2 in Group1. ULAR required consumables costing an average of 45 000 rubles more than did ISR. 
Conclusion. Both surgical procedures are comparable in the duration of a surgical intervention, the volume of intraoperative blood loss, and the quality of TME. ULAR with a reservoir is functionally more preferential. 

 

About the Author

I. L. Chernikovsky
aint Petersburg Clinical Research-Practical Center for Specialized Medical (Oncology) Cares; 68a Leningradskaya St., Pesochnyi Settlement, Saint Petersburg, 197758, Russia
Russian Federation


References

1. Бондарь Г.В., Башеев В.Х., Думанский Ю.В. Успехи и проблемы лечения рака прямой кишки. Новоутворення 2009; 3–4:19–24. [Bondar G.V., Basheev V.H., Dumansky Yu.V. Successes and problems of rectal cancer management. Novoutvorennya = Neoplasms 2009;3–4:19–24. (In Russ.)].

2. Пикунов Д.Ю., Кашников В.Н., Джанаев Ю.А., Рыбаков Е.Г. Отдаленные результаты сохранения элементов наружного сфинктера при нижнеампулярном раке прямой кишки. Клиническая онкология 2011;1:43–6. [Pikunov D.Yu., Kashnikov V.N., Djanaev Yu.А., Rybakov E.G. Long-term results of external sphincter elements preservation at rectal lower ampulla cancer. Klinicheskaya onkologiya = Clinical Oncology 2011;1:43–6. (In Russ.)].

3. Jemal A., Siegel R., Ward E. et al. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 2009;59(4):225–49.

4. Karanjia N.D., Schache D.J., North W.R., Heald R.J. “Close shave” in anterior resection. Br J Surg 1990;77(5):510–2.

5. Leo E., Belli F., Andreola S. et al. Total rectal resection and complete mesorectum excision followed by coloendoanal anastomosis as the optimal treatment for low rectal cancer: the experience of the National Cancer Institute of Milano. Ann Surg Oncol 2000;7(2):125–32.

6. Martin S.T., Heneghan H.M., Winter D.C. Systematic review of outcomes after intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Brit J Surg 2012;99(5):603–12.

7. Tilney H.S., Tekkis P.P. Extending the horizons of restorative rectal surgery: intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2008;10(1):3–15.

8. Воробьев Г.И., Шелыгин Ю.А., Еропкин П.В. и др. Проктэктомия с сохранением элементов наружного сфинктера в хирургии нижнеампулярного рака прямой кишки. Хирургия 2008;9:10–5. [Vorobyev G.I., Shelygin Yu.A., Eropkin P.V. et al. Proctectomy with preservation of external sphincter elements in surgery of rectal lower ampulla cancer. Khirurgiya = Surgery 2008;9:10–5. (In Russ.)].

9. Enker W.E. Total mesorectal excision – the new golden standard of surgery for rectal cancer. Ann Med 1997;29(2):127–33.

10. Heald R.J., Moran B.J., Ryall R.D. et al. Rectal cancer: the Basingstoke experience of total mesorectal excision, 1978–1997. Arch Surg 1998;133(8):894–9.

11. Jehle E.C., Haehnel T., Starlinger M.J., Becker H.D. Level of the anastomosis does not influence functional outcome after anterior rectal resection for rectal cancer. Am J Surg 1995;169(1):147–52.

12. Guillou P.J., Quirke P., Thorpe H. et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial) multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005;365(9472):1718–26.

13. Kang S.B., Park J.W., Jeong S.Y. et al. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2010;11(7):637–45.

14. van der Pas M.H., Haglind E., Cuesta M.A. et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2013;14(3):210–8.

15. Jeong S., Park J., Nam B. et al. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or lowrectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2014;15(7): 767–74.

16. Green B., Marshall H., Collinson F. et al. Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2013;100(1):75–82.

17. Reybard J.F. Memoire sur une tumeur cancereuse affectant l'illiaque du colon: ablation de la tumeur et de l'intestin. Bull Acad Roy Med 1833;2.

18. Петров Б.А. Абдоминальная резекция прямой кишки. В кн.: Труды Института скорой помощи им. Склифосовского. М.: Медгиз, 1943. С. 256–64. [Petrov B.A. Abdominal proctectomy. In book: Treatises of Sklifasovsky Ambulance Institute. Moscow: Medgiz, 1943. Pp. 256–64. (In Russ.)].

19. Dixon C.F. Anterior resection for malignant lesions of the upper part of the rectum and lower part of the sigmoid. Ann Surg 1948;128(3):425–42.

20. Лыткин М.И., Клур В.Ю., Чалисов И.А. Сравнительная оценка проксимальных резекций по поводу рака прямой кишки. Вестник хирургии 1989;8:38–42. [Lytkin M.I., Klur V.Yu., Chalisov I.A. Comparative assessment of proximal resections made forrectal cancer. Vestnik khirurgii = Herald of Surgery 1989;8:38–42. (In Russ.)].

21. Polglase A.L., McMurrick P.J., Tremayne A.B., Bhathal P.S. Local recurrence after curative anterior resection with principally blunt dissection for carcinoma of the rectum and rectosigmoid. Dis Colon Rectum 2001;44(7):947–54.

22. Lee M.R., Hong C.W., Yoon S.N. et al. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection for rectal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 2006;53(71):682–6.

23. Law W.I., Chu K.W., Ho J.W., Chan C.W. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision. Am J Surg 2000;179(2):92–6.

24. Peeters K.C., Tollenaar R.A., Marijnen C.A. et al. Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2005;92(2):211–6.

25. Wang L., Gu J. Risk factors for symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer with 30 Gy/10 f/2 w preoperative radiotherapy. World J Surg 2010;34(5):1080–5.

26. Shiomi A., Ito M., Maeda K. et al. Effects of a diverting stoma on symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis of 1,014 consecutive patients. J Am Coll Surg 2015;220(2):186–94.

27. Хубезов Д.А. Выбор методики и границ лапароскопической передней резекции прямой кишки. Автореф. дис. ... д-ра мед. наук. Рязань, 2009. [Khubezov D.A. Choice of methods and limits of laparoscopic anterior resection of rectum. Autors abstract of thesis of ... doctor of medical sciences. Ryazan, 2009. (In Russ.)].

28. Царьков П.В, Тулина И.А. Некоторые спорные вопросы истории развития хирургии рака прямой кишки. Хирургия. Журнал им. Н.И. Пирогова 2012;1:53–57. [Tsarkov P.V., Tulina I.A. Several outstanding issues of rectal surgery development. Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im N.I. Pirogova = Surgery. N.I. Pirogov Journal 2012;1:53–57. (In Russ.)].

29. Rubin F., Douard R., Wind P. The functional outcomes of coloanal and low colorectal anastomoses with reservoirs after low rectal cancer resections. Am Surg 2014;80(12): 1222–9.

30. Rink A.D., Haaf F., Knupper N., Vestweber K.H. Prospective randomised trial comparing ileocaecal interposition and colon-J-pouch as rectal replacement after total mesorectal excision. Int J Colorectal Dis 2007;22:2:153–60.

31. Hamel C.T., Metzger J., Curti G. et al. Ileocecal reservoir reconstruction after total mesorectal excision: functional results of the long-term follow-up. Int J Colorectal Dis 2004;19(6):574–9.

32. Hochenegg J. Die sakrale methode der extirpation von mastdaimkrebsen nach Prof. Kraske. Wien Klin Wochensch 1888;1:254.

33. Bacon H.E. Evaluation of sphincter muscle preservation and reestablishment of continuity in the operative treatment of rectal and sigmoidal cancer. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1945;81:113.

34. Schumpelick V., Braun J. Intersphincteric rectum resection with radical mesorectum excision and colo-anal anastomosis Chirurg 1996;67(2):110–20.

35. Pavlidis T.E., Pavlidis E.T., Sakantamis A.K. The role of intersphincteric resection in very low rectal cancer. Letter to the Editor. Sotiety of surgical oncology.

36. Панкратов И.В., Клоков С.С., Кошель А.П. Способ выбора оперативного вмешательства при низком раке прямой кишки. 3-й съезд хирургов Сибири и Дальнего Востока. Томск, 2009. С. 113–4. [Pankratov I.V., Klokov S.S., Koshel A.P. Surgery choice method at lower rectum cancer. 3rd Congress of surgeons of Siberia and Far East. Tomsk, 2009. Pp. 113–4. (In Russ.)].

37. Чеканов М.Н., Штофин С.Г., Якушенко В.К. Интерсфинктерная интрапуборектальная резекция в хирургии дистального прямокишечного рака. Новый хирургический архив 2001;1(1). [Chekanov M.N., Shtofin S.G., Yakushenko V.K. Intersphincter intrapuborectalis resection in surgery of distal rectal cancer. Novyi khirurgicheskiy arkhiv = New Surgery Archive 2001;1(1). (In Russ.)].

38. Щепотин И.Б., Колесник Е.А., Приймак В.В. Эволюция сфинктерсохраняющей хирургии у больных раком нижнеампулярного отдела прямой кишки. Клиническая онкология 2013;4:16–20. [Schepotin I.B., Kolesnik E.A., Priymak V.V. Evolution of sphincter-preserving surgery in patients with cancer of rectal lower ampulla. Klinicheskaya onkologiya = Clinical Oncology 2013;4:16–20. (In Russ.)].

39. Denost Q., Adam J.P., Pontallier A. et al. Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 2015;261(1):138–43.

40. Bretagnol F., Rullier E., Couderc P. et al. Technical and oncological feasibility of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with pouch coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2003;5(5):451–3.

41. Расулов А.О., Мамедли З.З., Кулушев В.М. и др. Лапароскопическая интерсфинктерная брюшно-анальная резекция прямой кишки по поводу нижнеампулярного рака с трансанальным удалением препарата, формированием толстокишечного J-образного резервуара и колоанального анастомоза. Эндоскопическая хирургия 2014;20(1): 42–7. [Rasulov A.O., Mamedli Z.Z., Kulushev V.M. et al. Laparoscopic intersphincter abdominoanal resection of rectum for rectal lower ampulla cancer with transanal resection of surgical specimen, formation of colonic J-pouch and coloanal anastomosis. Endoskopicheskaya khirurgiya = Endoscopic Surgery 2014;20(1):42–7. (In Russ.)].

42. Benoist S., Panis Y., Boleslawski E. et al. Functional outcome after coloanal versus low colorectal anastomosis for rectal carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 1997;185(2):114–9.

43. Hiranyakas A., Ho Y.H. Laparoscopic ultralow anterior resection versus laparoscopic pull-through with coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancers: a comparative study. Am J Surg 2011;202(3):291–7.


Review

Views: 2975


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-5857 (Online)