QUALITY OF LIFE OF FEMALE PATIENTS, WHO UNDERWENT RECTAL CANCER SURGERY
https://doi.org/10.17650/2220-3478-2013-0-2-37-41
Abstract
Quality of life is the second most important clinical outcome criteria for cancer patients after survival. Quality of life shows the completeness of social rehabilitations of patients, who underwent radical treatment. In present study quality of life of 41 rectal cancer patients, who underwent abdominoperineal resection (n = 22) or anterior resection (n = 19) was assessed using SF-36 questionnaire. All patients without permanent colostomy had better postoperative quality of life. The phycho-emotional state of patients with permanent colostomy progres-sively decreases. The present study is important for developing an individualized rehabilitation programme for female rectal cancer patients.
About the Authors
S. V. AveryanovaRussian Federation
L. M. Bardenstein
Russian Federation
O. M. Konopazkova
Russian Federation
E. A. Dementyeva
Russian Federation
L. Z. Velsher
Russian Federation
References
1. Бримкулов Н.Н., Сенкевич Н.Ю., Калиев а А.Д. Применение опросника SF-36 для оценки качества жизни. Центральноазиатский медицинский журнал 1998;4–5:236–41.
2. Володин Б.Ю., Петров Е.П., Кулико в А.И. и др. Внутренняя картина болезни и особенности психотерапевтической коррекции у больных раком молочной железы и тела матки. Российский онкологический журнал 2006;1:38–40.
3. Новик А.А., Матвеев С.А., Ионов а Т.И. Оценка качества жизни больного в медицине. Клиническая медицина 2000;2:10–3.
4. Renner K., Rosen H.R., Novi G. et al. Quality of life after surgery for rectal cancer: do we still need a permanent colostomy? Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:1160–7.
5. Jehle E.C., Haehnet T., Starlinger M.J. et al. Level of the anastomosis does not influence functional outcome after anterior rectal resection for rectal cancer. Am J Surg 1995;169:147–52; discussion P. 152–153.
6. Matsuoka N., Moriya Y., Kasu T., Fujita S. Long-term outcome of urinary function after extended lymphadenectomy in patients with distal rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2001;27:165–9.
7. McDonald P.J., Heald R.J. A survey of postoperative function after rectal anastomosis with circular stapling devices. Br J Surg 1983;70:727–9.
8. Marquis R., Lasry J.C., Heppel J. et al. Quality of life of patients after restorative surgery for cancer of the rectum. Ann Chir 1992;46:830–8.
9. Lewis W.G., Martin J.G., Williamso n M.E. et al. Why do some patients experience poor functional results after anterior resection of the rectum for carcinoma? Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:259–63.
10. ВОЗ МКБ-10. Классификация психических и поведенческих расстройств. Исследовательские диагностические критерии. Всемирная Организация Здравоохранения. Женева, 1994.
11. Ware J.E. Measuring patients’ views: the optimum outcome measure. BMJ 1993;306:1429–30.
12. Engel J., Kerr J., Schlesinger-Raab A. et al. Quality of life in Rectal Cancer Patients. A Four-Year Prospective Study. Ann Surg 2003;238(2):203–13.
13. Gotay C.C. Trial-related quality of life: using quality-of-life assessment to distinguish among cancer therapies. J Nabl Cancer Inst Monogr 1996:4–6.
14. Little P., Everitt H., Williamson I. et al. Observational study of effect of patient centredness and positive approach on outcomes of general practice consultations. BMJ 2001;323:908–11.
15. Mills M.E., Sullivan K. The importance of information giving for patients newly di-agnosed with cancer: a review of the literature. J Clin Nurs 1999;8:631–42.
16. Schaube J., Scharf R. The quality of life after extirpation of the rectum for carcinoma. Dtsh Med Wochenschr 1996;121:153–7.
17. Campos-Lobato L.F., Alves-Ferreira P.C., Lavery I.C., Kiran R.P. Abdominoperineal resection does not decrease quality of life in patients with low rectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst 2012;12.